I mean your MacBook numbers are quite exactly what to expect if the MacPro makes use of 4 CPUs with 2,66 GHz and your MacBook uses 2 Cores with 2 GHz. applications like Apple's Motion make a heavy use of the graphics card. The thing is that professional Mac users often speculate on the importance of graphics cards. what makes the MacMini and MacBook so interesting is that the Intel GMA graphics are virtually like no graphic card at all ) The graphics card appears to be "Intel GMA 950 graphics processor with 64MB of DDR2 SDRAM shared with main memory". Re: Artlantis Benchmark - Please contribute Sent : 02:22:41 Please keep this thread free of spam and chat, making it attractive for external links. Windows PCs, especially Pentium4, Pentium4 with HT, Pentium M, Pentium Dual Core, AMD Dual Core etc. Macs with PowerPC processor (G4, G5 etc.)
other Intel Macs (MacMini, MacPro, MacBookPro, MacBook) Alternatively, just write the rendering time in this thread - be honest! Also give some facts about your hardware, especially Artlantis version, CPU, memory and graphics. Make a screenshot of your picture + rendering time and post it here. go to ACCamera_9 (this should be the only camera anyways) If asked, direct Artlantis to the water bumpmap make sure there are no other applications then Artlantis running But I think it is better this way, because people with low or medium hardware can take part too. I know this benchmark file is a little to simple for highend PCs and Macs. contains no textures except the water bumpmap I'd like to know what speed improvements I can expect in terms of rendering.īut this thread is also for hardware comparisons in general, making people's decision what hardware to buy a little easier.
Soon I will switch from a Apple Dual G5 to an Apple Intel iMac. Artlantis Benchmark - Please contribute Sent : 00:41:36
0 kommentar(er)
